I'm going to tell you a story. It's about a webmaster who sold some permanent links. The thing is that this webmaster had no intention of keeping the links displayed on his site permanently: he thought he'd just keep them up for a couple of months then remove them when the buyers had forgotten. He might even try and re-sell the same links again and make some more dishonest profit.
Sadly for this man one of the buyers was sharp and spotted his links had been removed. When the aggrieved buyer publicly challenged the webmaster other people started saying the same things. The webmaster got angry and tried to defend himself by saying he had sold the site and it was the new owner who had removed the links. Clever, huh? No-one could challenge him on this because no-one could prove otherwise. Until now that is.
As you may have spotted the story above relates to our article about the temporary permanent links. Sundaybrew, thinking himself oh so clever, claimed that the reason people's permanent links had been removed from his site sundaybrew.com was because he had sold it to someone else. Have a close look at this screenshot of sundaybrew.com which was captured earlier today:
I suggest that the writing on that page belongs to sundaybrew. It is written in his style: poorly with odd letters and double spaces. I also suggest that this proves he retained control of that site and was responsible for removing those links.
A new site isn't going to change past history.
Sadly for this man one of the buyers was sharp and spotted his links had been removed. When the aggrieved buyer publicly challenged the webmaster other people started saying the same things. The webmaster got angry and tried to defend himself by saying he had sold the site and it was the new owner who had removed the links. Clever, huh? No-one could challenge him on this because no-one could prove otherwise. Until now that is.
As you may have spotted the story above relates to our article about the temporary permanent links. Sundaybrew, thinking himself oh so clever, claimed that the reason people's permanent links had been removed from his site sundaybrew.com was because he had sold it to someone else. Have a close look at this screenshot of sundaybrew.com which was captured earlier today:
I suggest that the writing on that page belongs to sundaybrew. It is written in his style: poorly with odd letters and double spaces. I also suggest that this proves he retained control of that site and was responsible for removing those links.
A new site isn't going to change past history.
